Home >

Beijing Consumers Association: Silk Clothing Comparative Test 40% Failed

2019/8/2 10:47:00 0

SilkClothingUnqualified

In August 1st, the Consumer Association of Beijing announced the results of a comparative test of 96 brands of 100 silk garments samples. The results showed that 40 samples of the 100 test samples did not meet the standard requirements. Among the 30 samples purchased by the entity store, 5 samples were in question, accounting for 16.7% of the samples in the physical store. 35 samples were found in 70 samples purchased by the online shopping platform, accounting for 50% of the samples purchased online. There are 9 samples that are not contained in mulberry silk, and are not in line with the publicity or product description. Little red books, many spells, and samples purchased by Taobao all fail to meet the standard requirements.

City Consumers Association said that fiber content is an important reference index for consumers to choose silk clothing, and is also the only basis for judging whether the product is silk clothing. On the basis of the fiber content index test, the comparison test also compares the online shopping sample results with the web page express information. After testing, the measured values of the fiber content of the 9 samples in the 100 samples are not consistent with the tag. In the 70 samples of online shopping, there are 6 samples of the measured fiber composition inconsistent with the web page claimed information.

According to the test, the measured content of the 9 samples does not conform to the indication of the tag, and three of them are identified as mulberry silk. Dynamic brother brother brand, model 8888802054133 women's clothing, the sample is made of mulberry silk 100, measured as viscose 88.3, nylon 11.7; Liang Ma boutique sells a brand of mother's clothing for the ancient Chan GUCHAN's clothing, express the nominal silk 95, anti pilling fiber 5, measured as regenerated cellulose fiber 58.6, acrylic 28.2, nylon 6.7, and a elegant men's clothing sales men's clothing, after the production enterprise carries on the result feedback, the Guangzhou Montagut Commercial Co., Ltd. replied that the Montagut brand's tested sample and its selling product's product tag and the main mark difference are quite big, the three commodities are purchased from many platforms, which are produced by the nominal Guangzhou Hang Cheong day Garments Co., Ltd.

After testing, there are 6 online shopping samples, which are claimed to be silk clothing, but the label does not contain silk. Although some products are labeled with their real fiber content in the details page, consumers will be misled if they do not distinguish carefully.

  • Related reading

Ministry Of Commerce: 61 Countries Have Confirmed Second Exhibitors Fair.

Standard quality
|
2019/7/26 19:15:00
4

GB: Please Check 3 Textile Related Standards, The GB Issued Second Batch Of Recommended National Standard Plan Notice.

Standard quality
|
2019/7/24 9:01:00
1

Henan Market Supervision Bureau Spot Checks 60 Batches Of Casual Clothing Products Failed 5 Batches

Standard quality
|
2019/7/8 9:17:00
0

Chanel Recently Lost A Lawsuit In China's "Double C" Trademark Rights Protection Case

Standard quality
|
2019/7/5 11:02:00
1

Henan Spot Checks 60 Batches Of Casual Clothing Products Unqualified Yuanhua Dream, Nelun, FM Ni, Tai Ke Si 5 Batches.

Standard quality
|
2019/5/23 9:31:00
9228
Read the next article

Under The Direct Broadcast Ecosystem, How Does The Clothing Enterprise C Debut?

In the recent decline of show live broadcast, Taobao's live broadcasting has ushered in huge traffic growth. According to publicly released data, Taobao joined Taobao in 2018.